For Kushner, Israel Policy May Be Shaped by the Personal

For Kushner, Israel Policy May Be Shaped by the Personal

Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law, has a profound connection to Israel

Jared Kushner, second from left, with his wife, Ivanka Trump, and Stephen K. Bannon, the president’s chief adviser, at the White House on Friday for a visit by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan. Doug Mills/The New York Times

Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law, has a profound connection to Israel. When he meets with the country’s prime minister on Wednesday, it will be a gathering influenced by old encounters and shared experiences.

by Jodi Kantar

New York Times

When Jared Kushner was 17 years old, he stood where a million Jews had been murdered and listened to Israel’s prime minister stress the country’s importance.

“The Holocaust could have been prevented. We know it could not have taken place had the Jewish state been established a few years earlier,” the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said in 1998, standing amid the ruins of an Auschwitz-Birkenau crematory. He had just led Mr. Kushner and thousands of other teenagers waving Israeli flags in a procession through the camp’s gates and past the barracks. As part of the commemoration, the group would soon leave Poland and fly to Israel, to complete the journey from slaughter to Zionist rebirth.

Read the full article here.

Also see:

“Taking Down” British Officials – Philip Giraldi

Look who’s in charge of UK government cyber security

Britain’s sickening infatuation with Israel continues



  1. Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war. In all those pages, there is not one single mention of the “holocaust”. Not even as a footnote. Additionally, Abram Leon Sachar, first president of Brandeis University, wrote a book entitled “History of the Jews” (first published in 1930). The fifth and final edition was published in 1968. For literally decades, this was the “go to” book for Jewish history. But in his fifth edition, this holocaust that’s now being promoted 24/7/365 was covered in a measly 4 pages. Why so little coverage of this seminal event in Jewish history? The original commemorative plaque at Auschwitz said 4 million suffered and died there. It was replaced, with no fanfare, in 1990, with a plaque that states that 1.5 million died there. So why didn’t the magic 6 million figure change accordingly? And why was this “important” historical event given no mention at all in so many earlier books about WWII? Why are there laws protecting the official story? If this is such an immutable truth, then it shouldn’t need legal assistance, it should be able to stand on its own. Why are the records released by the American Red Cross detailing deaths in these camps being suppressed by the media? Allowing a generous 10 lbs. of remains per “victim”, 6 million dead would result in 30,000 tons of remains. Why is it that these remains have never been found? Kind of hard to hide that many bodies. Last, for now, as Norman Finkelstein’s (author, “The Holocaust Industry”) sainted grandmother famously told him “if the Nazis killed all these Jews then where are all these “survivors coming from?”.
    I ask about the above repeatedly in forums here and there and no”holocaust” advocates have steppped up to the plate and provided an answer yet.