1

WTC7: The “Smoking Gun” of 9/11

WTC7 according to Danny Jowenko was absolutely brought down by a controlled demolition.

by Debbie Menon / My Catbird Seat

The accident of prominent Dutch “demolition expert” Danny Jowenko is of special interest to us, because on July 13th 2011 in an exclusive Press TV interview, Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Veterans Today Board member and editor, specifically drew attention to the Dutch demolition expert, Danny Jowenko, stating that two years ago, he came across an extremely disturbing video in which Danny Jowenko was interviewed concerning the collapse on 9/11, of a 3rd World Trade Center building.  WTC7, a 47 storey building, the third tallest building, which was not hit by a plane, which was conspicuously missing in the 9/11 commission report and which according to Danny Jowenko was absolutely brought down by a controlled demolition. “That is, WTC-7 went straight down into its own footprint in seconds without any visible external trauma, which means only some catastrophic internal trauma could have brought it down, concluded Sabrosky.” He has repeatedly cited the well known demolition experts’ views and interview in his recent articles and interviews.

On July 16th, 2011, Danny Jowenko  died in a one-sided car accident, a frontal collision with a tree,  in the village of Serooskerke, The Netherlands

Danny Jowenko deceased at Serooskerke (W)

Danny Jowenko from the church in Veere Saturday Serooskerke killed in a frontal collision with a tree.

The accident happened just before half past seven at the height of the industrial area at the intersection zomp Wilgenhoekweg / Hondegemseweg. The victim died on the spot and squeezed Sat. There was also a dog in the car. He was still alive, and is picked up by the animal.

(Publication date 17/7/2011)

Accidents do happen.  And, he was not a singularly important and threatening guy like editor Sean Hoar was or Dr. David Kelly (weapons expert) was.

He was but one of many who have provided valuable and incontrovertible testimony, but still only one of many, and not imminently threatening danger to anyone.  I would have to know more about the circumstances of his “accident” before I would let paranoia kick in.

On the other hand, you do not have to kill many chickens to frighten the monkeys… but the people like  Dr. David Kelly, Danny Jowenko and Sean Hoar who are giving testimony such as they have, and pushing that particular cart, are not exactly monkeys, and I doubt that the death of a few chickens will frighten many of them off the task anyway!

I pity the dog for, unless he has hospitalization insurance or happens to be on a government payroll, they will simply administer an overdose and bury him.

Frontal collisions with trees are the worst kind.  Are there any others?

RIP Danny!

PART 2 of 3

PART 3 of 3

Related post

 

 

One Comment

  1. Solon on the 24. Jul, 2011 remarked #

    Alex Kane wrote this about the identity — and affiliations — of the Norway killer (do we call him a terrorist, or is that noun reserved for Muslims and Iranians?).

    But even more interesting than Kane’s analysis is this comment:

    http://mondoweiss.net/2011/07/the-norway-massacre-and-the-nexus-of-islamophobia-and-right-wing-zionism.html#comment-341863

    >>>>>I think you all are missing a very real possibility here. This guy, obviously, is a wackjob. He is in the same etherworldly kind of fanatical realm as Oswald, the Shoe Bomber, McViegh, Manson, etc. These are the kinds of twisted minds that can be cultured, nurtured, manipulated, and used to perform acts that enhance or advance political objectives or ideologies.

    There were some MSM reports that the early accusations and assertions of a “muslim” group claiming credit for these attacks came from the CIA. Many of those assertions have now been quietly redacted from the original online articles.

    Think. Is it possible that this is a false flag black-op gone wrong? Was this guy meant to simply disappear, and something went wrong, leading to his capture? Why target youths, if not for the powerful impact it has on eliciting a profitably fearful reaction from the public at large?

    The CIA seems to have had a pre-prepared “story line” for this event, which was promptly distributed to the MSM. Food for thought.

    WHAT IF THEY HADN’T OF CAUGHT THIS GUY??? WHAT MUSLIM GROUP WOULD NOW BE PARADED IN FRONT OF US AS THE PERPETRATOR OF THIS HORRENDOUS ACT, AND WHAT COUNTRY OF ORIGIN WOULD HAVE BEEN THE SCAPEGOAT?<<<<<

    Seems to me the suggestion is the Norway shooter was supposed to have been Jack Rubied, but somebody slipped up.

    If that's the case, it's not at all far-fetched to speculate that a string of "incidents" were to have occurred to clear Europe of inconvenient truthtellers — like Dan Jowenko.

    zionists are dangerous people. Zionists started WWI, and WWII, and the Iraq war, all for the same goal: the establishment and financing of the Jewish state in Palestine. Offing one witness with evidence of a contrary narrative would not even cause a zionist to shed a bead of sweat. They have become dehumanized, as had, apparently, the Norway killer. HE was dehumanized by reading Pam Geller, Daniel Pipes, and that Robert Spencer. Pipes and Spencer have briefed the CIA and numerous US military audiences over many years on many occasions.

Leave a Comment