2

I have a rule — I never intervene in Palestinian political matters. I never comment on Palestinian internal debate. I do not think that I have the right to do so : I am an ex-Israeli and an ex-Jew, and I write about Israel, Jewish Identity politics, and Zionism.

By Gilad Atzmon

The Palestine Authority

For me, the leaked Palestinian Papers provide us with a valuable glimpse into Israeli politics and Western complicity in the crimes carried out against the Palestinian people.  I do realise that most Palestinian commentators agree that the leaked papers have “damaged whatever little credibility the Ramallah-based authority still enjoyed among Palestinians” ; yet, more than anything else, the Papers prove beyond doubt that Israel is  not a partner for peace — In spite of the weaknesses that have been shown by the PA since the 1990’s, Israel has failed to secure a peace deal, and has consistently failed to show any will to bring the conflict to an end. In short — Israel has always wanted more.

The Papers have also clearly shown that whilst Israel likes to present an image of ‘political pluralism’ , that is little more than a deception : there is not much difference at all between  Tzipi Livni and Avigdor Lieberman. Both are Zionist enthusiasts, and both are interested in a ‘Jews only state’ — Indeed, just like Lieberman Livni too offered to “transfer Israeli Arabs.”

Yesterday, we learned that as far back as 2004, the British MI6 was assisting the PA in the war against Hamas: according to The Guardian, “The Palestinian Authority’s security strategy to crush Hamas and other armed groups on the West Bank was originally drawn up by Britain’s intelligence service, MI6”.

So, at the time that the British Government was supposedly advocating “democracy” in Palestine, the reality was quite different : British ‘James Bonds’ were investing enormous effort in trying to destroy the rising political power in Palestine. One may wonder : what kind of ‘British interests’ was the MI6 serving in doing so ?  It is far from being a secret that  in 2004 Tony Blair  was primarily funded by Labour Friends of Israel ; his NO 1 fund raiser  was Lord Levy.

The Palestinian  people will liberate themselves eventually — but it is also about time we all liberate ourselves from the grip of Israeli and Jewish lobbies.?

Gilad Atzmon was born a secular Israeli Jew in Tel Aviv and trained at the Rubin Academy of Music in Jerusalem.  His service as a paramedic in the Israeli Defense Forces during the 1982 Israeli invasion of Lebanon caused him to reach the conclusion that  “I was part of a colonial state, the result of plundering and ethnic cleansing.” In 1994 Atzmon emigrated from Israel to London, where he attended the University of Essex and earned a Masters degree in Philosophy.  He has lived there since, becoming a British citizen in 2002.  Atzmon’s novels have been published in 22 languages.  His first novel A Guide to the Perplexed, published in 2001, is set in a future where by 2052 Israel has been replaced by a Palestinian state for 40 years.  HIS WORK CAN BE FOUND AT: Gilad Atzmon – Writings

Related Posts:

LONDON’S FOREIGN OFFICE MIGHT AS WELL RELOCATE TO TEL AVIV

2 Comments

  1. Rehmat on the 28. Jan, 2011 remarked #

    “There is no rivalry between us (Israel and Fatah). But we have a common enemy. We are in a very difficult battle. We’ve decided to battle to the end. Everything is open, everything is on the table. Hamas is the enemy, and we’ve decided to go to battle against it. It is a matter of self defense,” Abu el-Fatah, the commander of the Palestinian General Security Organization told Brigadier General Noam Tibon, Judea and Samaria Division commander, Yideot Ahronot, October 9, 2009.

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/01/22/palestinians-the-enemies-within-and-outside/

  2. Debbie on the 28. Jan, 2011 remarked #

    Mazin Qumsiyeh’s take…

    Fear and The Palestine Papers

    Ignoring the hype about the Palestine papers is hard. I spent a lot of time
    reading through page after page of the documents showing minutes of meetings
    and other exchanges regarding the Palestinian-Israeli “negotiations” (the
    quotes are warranted). The Guardian newspaper summed up the back and forth
    arguments about these papers as follows:

    ” PA and PLO leaders such as Saeb Erekat can be expected to point out that
    one of the core principles of the negotiations is that ‘nothing is agreed
    until everything is agreed’. As such they are not necessarily committed to
    provisional positions that in the event failed to secure a settlement -
    though Erekat made clear to US officials in January 2010 that the same
    offers remained on the table. Critics are likely to argue that concessions -
    such as accepting the annexation of Israeli settlements in occupied East
    Jerusalem – are simply pocketed by the Israeli side, and risk being treated
    as a starting point in any future talks.”
    (
    apers>
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/23/story-behind-leaked-palestine-pa
    pers)

    For me two things come out clearly from these painful documents (some of
    them have parallel data in the US embassy cables on Wikileaks). First it is
    not that the Palestinian officials are traitors but merely (and this is bad
    enough) mistakenly and passionately going through motions hoping against all
    odds that by talking and compromising more they could achieve a tiny
    fraction of what we are entitled to. The second observation is that Israel
    will not sign a peace deal regardless of how low and ridiculous the
    concessions on the Palestinian side: hunt down resisters (abandoning the
    internationally recognized rights of resistance to occupation even unarmed
    one), give up on most settlements built illegally on Palestinian lands,
    allow Israel sovereignty over nearly 1/3rd of the occupied old city of
    Jerusalem, give up on the refugee rights, allow Israel to keep looting
    natural resources in the West Bank, give Israel the right to control our
    airspace, and even assure a statelet devoid of sovereignty. Not even tourism
    income would be allowed in this emasculated state. Some critics asked: if,
    as the documents show, the Palestinian negotiators were willing to accept
    all of this then WHY did Israeli politicians hold out?

    The answer is obvious to anyone who ever faced Zionism. They believe
    (rightly or wrongly) they can get 100% so why should they settle for 91% or
    even 99% especially when the ceiling of the Palestinian requests kept
    dropping in the past 22 years (since they accepted in 1988 to let Israel
    keep most of the looted parts of Palestine 1948). Today, Israel’s three
    main sources of income are dependent on a continued conflict and occupation:
    the 6.5 billion military and security exports, the 6 billion US and other
    western direct aid, and 3 billion from the captive markets in the West Bank
    and Gaza. All three would be threatened with end of conflict even if Israel
    gets to keep most of its stolen loot. Israeli officials are keen to keep
    negotiations going to avoid an anti-Apartheid scenario and for PR and
    normalization to keep pumping more money and more settlers into the
    remaining small shriveling Palestine because it is economically profitable.

    The recorded meetings show no real interest or even emotion or any sense of
    urgency on the part of the Israelis or their American benefactors. Saeb
    Erekat comes out basically pleading and begging sometimes and other times
    using the presence of Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran to try and convince these
    officials. Jim Jones, David, Hale, and (Israeli lobbyist Dennis Ross),
    Tzipi Livni, Mofaz etc. all just repeat utter few selective words and simply
    drag their feet to keep the “process going”. What would be the nature of
    the conversations if there was no Hamas to wave as the boogeyman to US
    officials and claim success in containing Hamas and other “extremist
    movements” (In Egypt Hosni Mubarak uses the same notion of containing
    Islamic Jihad but for the sinister goal of justifying his dictatorship)? US
    officials are very confident of their strength and the Israeli strengths and
    the fact that they only need the Palestinians to prevent any attempts at
    international isolation of Israel. This they get just by innuendo or hints
    of threats on the Palestinians authority. They studied the situation
    carefully and think that Abbas and company have no other options but to
    simply keep negotiating and compromising even if it takes another 20 years.
    In some very rare instances the negotiators seem to connect with their
    humanity and actually feel sorry for the fate of these Palestinian
    negotiators. But then you could sense how they curb their own feelings (as
    irrelevant) and go back to the scripted positions of their governments which
    are simply antagonistic to anything that is not 100% in support of Zionism.
    Erekat’s occasional threats of a one state seem vacuous and not serious. My
    book on Sharing the Land of Canaan showed with lots of data that “two state
    for two people” approach can never lead to genuine peace (if apartheid was
    the problem in South Africa, why is it considered a solution here?).

    I have a suggestion for the Palestinian authority: try to deal with the
    issues and do release your own documents instead of trying to shoot the
    messenger. Take lemons to make lemonade. Help introduce an even stronger
    resolution at the UN security council (e.g. in support of the Goldstone
    report or to recognize a Palestinian state along the borders of 1967) or a
    resolution at the UN General Assembly that calls for expelling Israel from
    the UN since it has never honored its commitments when it was admitted in
    1949. Maybe announce publicly that the Oslo Process was a mistake or at
    least is now dead (now every idiot knows it was and most of those who are
    getting salaries from the authority know in their hearts that it was
    contrary to basic human rights and to basic international law). This
    suggestion essentially is to show courage and backbone. It could also mean
    the difference: making mistakes is human, continuing the path as in the past
    only validates those who accuse the authority figures of treason. Abbas
    says he will surprise us in September but I believe he and those around him
    do not have that kind of time.
    I, like Edward Said and millions of Palestinians, disagreed strongly with
    the choices made by this Oslo group to built the Palestinian autonomous
    administration (of the Palestinian people warehouses or concentration camps)
    that relieved Israel from the burdens of managing us and from International
    isolation based on not even promises of freedom or return of rights. But I
    also can’t help but feel sorry for those who took that path. It must be very
    painful for a human being to go down a tunnel where there is no possibility
    of a light at the end and during this trip into the depths of darkness feel
    the leaches crawling up his back sucking his blood and voices from behind
    calling him back (some of them his political enemies, others ex-comrades in
    Fatah). Palestinian negotiators are fearful of going back because they think
    it might give political opponents a PR tool. They are just fearful of losing
    face; I am always grateful to a wise advisor who 30 years ago convinced me
    to drop this fear of admitting mistakes (a fear common especially among
    men). They may also be fearful of losing a job. The Palestinian people are
    very angry though many feel afraid to speak out for fear to lose their
    sources of income, fear that the alternative to Fatah maybe just as bad,
    fear of Israel, fear of the US or just simply fear of their own power. But
    ultimately fear is a lack of self-confidence to take another course. And
    their fear should be balanced by the fact that people are literally dying
    for justice and wanting leaders to care about them and not about themselves.
    [Here we must remember the thousands of martyrs who gave their lives and
    hundreds of thousands who were injured or lost homes and livelihood and
    still yearn for freedom].

    The status quo is to many humans a comfort in the known/predictable. Taking
    another path is feared because humans fear the unknown. I believe that fear
    is the most destructive and paralyzing human emotion. Common people around
    the world are just beginning to break the barrier of fear and speak up more
    for themselves. From Tunisia to Egypt to Lebanon, the walls of fear are
    cracking. We common people and even some leaders must realize that many of
    these walls are far weaker than we may think. I can actually hear them
    cracking.

    The Arab world is in revolt. The fire is spreading. Responsible people
    need to step forward with courage and conviction. There could be surprises
    along those lines even from Central Committee members of Fatah. Already
    Nabil Shaath took a position different than Mahmoud Abbas. This is just the
    beginning. Palestine will survive. The Palestinian people are not sheep.
    They are mature enough to take the truth and to rebuild our national
    liberation movement. History marches on and I am 100% sure that Zionism
    will fail and Palestine will be free.

    ——————–
    Palestinian Students take over Palestine London offices demanding
    representation of all Palestinians. I think their call for representation
    based on the Prisoner’s documents and the Cairo Declaration) should be
    taken-up by all Palestinians of conscience. See
    http://ploembassysitin.tumblr.com/

    A Call to the People and Governments of the Free World from the Egyptian
    National Coalition: We call upon all of you to support the Egyptian people’s
    demands for a good life, liberty and an end of despotism. We call upon you
    to urge this dictatorial regime to stop its bloodshed of the Egyptian
    people, exercised throughout Egyptian cities.. We believe that the material
    and moral support offered to the Egyptian regime, by the American government
    and European governments, has helped to suppress the Egyptian people. We
    hereby call upon the people of the free world to support the Egyptian
    people’s non-violent revolution against corruption and tyranny. We also call
    upon civil society organizations in America, Europe and the whole world to
    express their solidarity with Egypt, through holding public demonstrations,
    particularly on People’s Anger Day (28/01/2011), and by denouncing the use
    of violence against the people. We hope that you will all support our
    demands for freedom, justice and peaceful change.

    The Guardian Newspaper: Palestinian distrust of Iran revealed in leaked
    papers. Mahmoud Abbas asked businessman to donate $50m to Mahmoud
    Ahmadinejad’s opponents, according to the documents

    d-papers>
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/26/palestinian-distrust-iran-leaked
    -papers

    Media Matters M.J. Rosenberg stated about the Papers: “The bottom line is
    that, despite the assurances the Palestinian Authority gave to the
    Palestinian people that it was driving a hard bargain with the Israelis, the
    Palestinian Authority accepted Israel’s position on every key point:
    borders, Jerusalem, settlements, refugees. On no major issue did the PA
    hold the line. None. The Palestinians offered Israel everything Israel wants
    and Israel still said “no” with the backing of the United States.”

    http://politicalcorrection.org/fpmatters/201101240004

    It is interesting to see such analysis as from former top CIA official
    Robert Grenier:

    ml>
    http://english.aljazeera.net/palestinepapers/2011/01/2011123135633144648.htm
    l

    But even though career diplomats are voicing interesting opinions and
    diversions from official policy, the Obama administration still shows the
    notion of just drawing on AIPAC associated fossilized brains. (see
    Why Obama’s “new thinking” initiative on Middle East peace is doomed to fail
    By Lawrence Davidson
    http://www.redress.cc/americas/ldavidson20110122)
    Palestinian intellectuals and activists articulated why this is the end of
    the charade of the peace process industry Karma Nabulsi gives a pointed
    analysis

    ss-over-palestinians>
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/23/middle-east-peace-proces
    s-over-palestinians

    Prof. Saree Makdisi shows more emotion as he writes “The Palestinian people
    betrayed”

    ans-20110127,0,3343339.column>
    http://latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-makdisi-israelis-palestinia
    ns-20110127,0,3343339.column

    Yet another BDS victory: John Lewis stops stocking Ahava products in Britain
    ain/>
    http://www.bigcampaign.org/john-lewis-stops-stocking-ahava-products-in-brita
    in/

    Mazin Qumsiyeh, PhD
    http://qumsiyeh.org

    ————– next part ————–
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed…
    URL:
    _______________________________________________
    HumanRights newsletter
    http://lists.qumsiyeh.org/mailman/listinfo/humanrights
    This message was sent to debbiemenon@gmail.com. To unsubscribe, visit:
    http://lists.qumsiyeh.org/mailman/options/humanrights/debbiemenon%40gmail.com

Leave a Comment