21

BUILDINGWHAT.ORG IS ABOUT HONOR AND JUSTICE

This week, Geraldo Rivera was foiled in his attempt to “contain” the 9/11 movement, something exploding around the world.  A Herald Sun poll in Australia the week before, 10,000 respondents, showed 78% support for 9/11 being an “inside job.”  A reasonable estimate for Americans is likely to approach the same figure.

Fox News now “owns” 9/11 as much as they own Glen Beck.  First, Judge Napolitano “outed” the phony investigation now Geraldo Rivera has taken a strong stand on the (www.buildingwhat.org) Building 7 demolition issue.  If you put both shows together, they lead to the most frightening coverup in modern history and a clear evidentiary trail, one Fox News has exposed.  Why, then, is the door opened and then closed again?  Why are we “dancing around” as though 9/11 were a joke?  When we talk Building 7 and explosions, the specific issue that Geraldo Rivera and Fox News are now ready to accept as “very possible,” we are talking murder.

When the relatives of the dead from Building 7 are seen on the television commercial, they are telling us, as was done on Geraldo, that their family members died in explosions that were purposefully set.  As there is more than “probable” cause that the explosions that killed so many were purposeful and extremely criminal, real terrorism, real murder and we can easily find who is responsible, why are we “dancing around?”

When Rivera accuses demonstrators of being “nut jobs” two years ago, he is showing his own ignorance.  He believes, as he is saying now, that since qualified engineers are now doubting the official explanation, anyone demonstrating “now” is not a “nut job” at all.  What the ignorant narcissist fool Rivera is missing, of course, is that when the demonstrators he attack were out there, two years ago, engineers and architects had long ago come forward, not two years ago, not five years ago.  To Rivera, there is no reality, there is no truth, until “he” learns of it.  Where in hell do we find people like this.

I keep seeing him unearthing the secret “Al Capone” bunker in Chicago.  This is the same Geraldo Rivera.

AMBUSH ATTEMPT BY RIVERA

Rivera tried, during the show, to “sucker” the parent of a Building 7 murder victim into a 2 minute discussion of 9/11 as an “inside job” knowing quite well he would be able to get a quick attack in.  Rivera was outwitted as the video shows, cut off at the legs.  Why would Rivera do this?

When we say “inside job,” we mean the US government but also we mean Israel.  It was an Israeli team that was arrested filming 9/11, openly admitting they knew in advance.  Israel also admitted they knew about the 1982 Beirut bombing that killed 224 Marines.  With “dual citizens” involved in planning the “war on terror,” surrounding and advising Bush and Cheney every step of the way, it is impossible to say “inside job” without saying “Israel did it” as we hear from Dr. Alan Sabrosky and journalist Alan Hart.

It was easy to see where Rivera was heading, you could hear the hate in his voice when he played the clip from two years ago.  Rivera owes them an apology but failed to see the irony of his own confusion.  Of course, Rivera could have an agenda.

WHY BUILDING 7?

Mr. Rivera leaves more than a few things out of his story.  The Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the group he is now behind, don’t just say Building 7 was a “mystery,” they say all three buildings were engineering impossibilities, even or perhaps “especially” those hit by planes.  The buildings were constructed to withstand, with no structural damage whatsoever, hits by larger planes than these.  When we say “no structural damage” we aren’t talking about them falling down.

Similarly, the Pentagon attack is, is possible, even more obvious than Building 7.  The reason building 7 is chosen is because there is enough hard evidence already to make arrests, enough evidence for criminal convictions for premeditated murder.  The case for Building 7 is there and those who could be arrested would shock the world.  This is why every move for any inquiry is crushed.  It would bring the world to a stop, for a brief second at least.

It would also leave the world better, safer and cleaner.  Nobody at Fox News wants that.

BRITAIN ‘COMING APART’ TOO, 7/7 COVERUP NOT HOLDING WATER

On July 7, 2005, bombs went off all over London.  An exhaustive Wikipedia article, carefully orchestrating the “spin,” blaming the bombings on Osama bin Laden, now known to have been dead for 4 years at the time, is an interesting read.  However, the families of those who died have been screaming “false flag” all along.  The timing, when Tony Blair was facing an election and a no-confidence vote on Iraq, was curious.  Some aspects of the bombing, in particular, the one bus which seemed purposefully rerouted, have millions of Britons up in arms.

Were there not “theories” that contradict the cursory and seemingly “planned in advance” investigation, the violent reactions by the government to requests for a new investigation have, in themselves, brought many to questioning the official story.  As with 9/11, it isn’t that Geraldo Rivera is reassessing his opinions, it is that he is doing it nearly a decade later,  after having every bit of evidence, he is now claiming he has just learned about what was at his disposal for years and years.  Rivera, heaven forbid, is a journalist, and has personally heard the engineering doubts about 9/11 dozens of times for many years.

Is Rivera more an actor?  Rodeo clown?

FOX IS NOT NEWS, FOX IS ISRAEL AND RIVERA IS AN ISRAELI

Covering up 9/11 is key to Israel’s foreign policy.  If they are blamed, America will turn on them as journalist Franklin Lamb warned this week.  Rivera, an Israeli citizen, has reason to have an agenda especially since he works for Fox News, owned by Rupert Murdoch, another Israeli citizen.  Rivera?  Murdoch?

Simply put, if 9/11 was an inside job, Israel was there every step of the way and so was Fox News.  Now they are trying to “spin” the story, control it, make murder a joke.

Murder is not a joke.  Building 7 was demolished with explosives placed there long before 9/11.  Rivera admits as much.  Watch the video.

This is premeditated murder.  Last time we checked, this was a crime in New York City.

Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran.  A 100% disabled vet.  He has been a featured commentator on TV and radio including Al Jazeera and his articles have been carried by news services around the world. He has been a UN Diplomat, defense contractor and is a widely published expert on military and defense issues.  This article first appeared in Veterans and Foreign Affairs Journal.

Senior Editor: Veterans Today

21 Comments

  1. george in Toronto on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    Reason is 2 fold.Almost 10 years and most Americans don’t care.2nd Republicians have taken over congress–no chance of a new investigation. Most of the courts judges ,politicians are on the side of Israel. 9/II is going to be a jewish Fairy tale for centuries to come. New York council will never allow it because Rudy Juilania was the man that called the shots. NY is very jewish controlled– forget it– spend time–term Limits 2X4 max for Fed politicians and no Hebs need apply {:^/

  2. pj on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    I dislike the phrase “Inside Job” because it is used by disinformation specialists to invoke a certain meaning, namely, the US government was solely responsible. Technically, though, if you consider that the US Government is absolutely infiltrated by Israeli dual citizens, then in that sense, yes, 911 was an inside job. History comes in waves, and while it is frustrating to see a buffoon like Jerry Riverstein or whatever his real name is trying to stem the tide, unless the NWO pulls a joker out of the deck soon (nuclear 911?), then a wave of history is hitting the USA pretty soon. Hope it works out, but we are a danger to this planet unless it does.

  3. rexw on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    I see above a comment from Philip Tourney, a survivor from the USS Liberty, that perfidious act by Israel in 1967. If anyone should know and understand treachery, it is Philip who has been trying for 43 years to gain some form of result from the despicable actions on that fateful day when so many of his shipmates died and so many others were seriously injured.
    Let us hope for the sake of Philip who has carried this story for 43 years and told all of those who would listen, not Presidents of course because there was never a possibility that they would turn on the perpetrators, Israel, which in this case there being absolutely no doubt. To me 9/11 is a disgrace when you consider the number of Americans that must know the truth. Yes, Americans! Will they be subject to criminal acts for just knowing about it and keeping quiet? Is that patriotic?

    But in the case of the USS Liberty, these were murderers from another country, a hated country, still walking the streets and laughing up their sleeves.

    If I was an American, I would pursue this matter and have all those undisputed facts aired for another US generation and see what they think in 2010. More than likely, the current occupant of the White House, as in the case of Johnson, would conveniently bury it as before in the remaining two years he has a bed there, without even a whimper from the American public.

    It has happened before and unless you can move fast on 9/11, it will happen again. The Zionazis must be brought to account on both events, together. Careful though, because you now have a stacked Supreme Court. See how it all comes together? . This is their fall back position.

    Clever, those American (?) Zionists

  4. SteveW on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    “Why, then, is the door opened and then closed again?”

    This question is not difficult to answer. A game of chicken is being played out on the world stage. The criminal psychopaths who are in power in Israel – who’s co-ethnics also control the mass media, including FAUX News – are deliberately sending a clear message to the corrupt & criminal political, military, and intelligence people who collaborated with them
    to engineer 9-11 in the first place. The message is simple: You will either launch the next war on our list against IRAN, and on any other nation that we tell you to destroy for us, or
    we will use our media influence to expose you for your role in 9-11. That spells arrests, charges of treason and mass murder, culpability in a criminal conspiracy so huge and so
    expansive that this nation’s government will be unable to survive the crisis. Rivera and Faux are not ‘suddenly’ having a moment of clarity or innocent curiosity, regarding this odd and highly suspicious ‘interest’ in the 9-11 Truth Movement and the hard facts that they’ve uncovered. No, they have been instructed by their bosses to open the pressure cooker and let just a little more steam out, as a means of sending a Mafia-like, Don Corleone-style warning to the civilian leadership.

    Incidentally, I am not a fan of the Kennedy family – but JFK knew that this terrorist state of Israel – if allowed to get their hands on nuclear weapons – would one day threaten the entire world, and that is precisely what these Satanic monsters are now doing.

  5. Floda on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    The trouble is your media, your courts and just about everything of importance is 100% controlled by the same vicious inner party shysters who were behind 911. They are laughing at all of us. They murdered 3,000 people and are laughing about it while they got their Hollywood connection to make ridiculous fairy tale movies like ‘Let’s roll’ to fool the boobs. A military coup is the only answer. Then remove these poisonous swindlers from every last winkle, especially the Media and Hollywood. Then ship the lot to Madagascar. Better still, drop them off half way.

  6. albury on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    re: http://www.nyccan.org/

    To Whom it May Concern:

    If you need to mount a campaign to inform NYC council members and others of the fact that WTC 7 collapsed almost 7 hours after the North Tower came down on 9/11, then what was the reason for its alleged controlled demolition in the first place? Did the US government need an additional building collapse that day that took no lives, well after both towers, WTCs 3, 4, 5, and 6, four airliners, and part of the Pentagon had already been destroyed or badly damaged, and nearly 3000 innocent people had been violently murdered, to get its almost unanimous congressional resolution to go to war in Afghanistan where al Qaeda was headquartered and where President Clinton sent Tomahawk missiles in response to their previous coordinated and deadly suicide operations against two US embassies in Africa in 1998?

    How on earth do you “bring justice” to Mr. McIlvaine’s remarkable and beloved son Robert G. by libeling 230+ NIST experts, Larry Silverstein, and countless others with absurd claims based on junk science by profiteering charlatans like Richard Gage and his “engineers,” and by harassing NYC council members for a new investigation when you obviously haven’t even bothered to read NCSTAR 1A, which is the product of a thorough and very competent investigation by people with real science and engineering credentials? Robert wasn’t even in WTC 7 when Muhammad Atta flew the hijacked Boeing 767 into WTC 1 ten stories below him on the morning of 9/11/01, and when he was suddenly and unexpectedly doomed to death along with everyone else in his group and everyone above the 92nd floor, nearly nine hours before the late afternoon collapse of WTC 7. The FDNY feared that it would eventually collapse, which is why they abandoned any effort to fight the fires and pulled everyone back a safe distance, preventing more “terrible loss of life,” as the lessee later related in a PBS interview.

    Robert’s death was a tragic loss, and my profound sympathy for Mr. McIlvaine is hard to put into words, but I’d like you and anyone else who’s thinking of signing your petition to answer the following questions first, since you’ve fallen prey to the manipulative liars of the 9/11 “truth movement” and think Larry Silverstein destroyed his own property or knew about it:

    -Why would Larry Silverstein have publicly admitted even to knowing that there were planted explosives in WTC 7 in the first place?
    -What was Silverstein Properties’ and the FDNY’s motive for blowing up a perfectly good, 14 year-old building, losing hundreds of millions of dollars in cash flow from it for eight years and counting, spending ~$700 million, or most of the $861 million insurance settlement, on the replacement of it, and paying ~$500 million back to lenders?
    (note: it was built in 1986-1987, at least 15 years after asbestos was written out of all building codes, and it had no asbestos in its SFRM or elsewhere. There was some on the first 38 floors of the North Tower, most of which had been abated during various tenant fit-outs well before he won the lease by default when Vornado’s deal with the PA fell though, but none in the South Tower, which was built after the code change went into effect)

    -Why would any insurance company have paid him a dime instead of the $4.68 BILLION total he received if he publicly admitted to foreknowledge of or complicity in the alleged secret demolition of his property, but especially those based in Copenhagen, Zurich (2 of them), and London? They all contested his claim of two occurrences based on two separate plane crashes, and he won in court in a few instances based on individual contract wording, but there was never any question relating to the causes of any WTC collapse.

    -How did he or the FDNY know that flaming debris from a much taller collapsing hi-rise across the street would hit WTC 7, start multi-story fires in it, and break the water main to it, disabling the sprinklers and providing a cover story for the alleged controlled demolition?

    -If the explosives were pre-planted, which would have taken weeks or even months in a vacant building and have been completely impossible to do secretly in an occupied one, and Barry Jennings heard some of them go off around 10 AM, why was there any discussion at all in mid-afternoon about whether or not to demolish WTC 7 with the other apparently fireproof explosives allegedly planted a few stories higher?

    -Do controlled demolitions take seven or eight hours to collapse a building?

    -Do they leave no severed columns with copper residue on the ends, or any other evidence in the debris?

    -Do they leave ~12 stories on one corner standing?

    -Is the FDNY in the controlled demolition business? What other buildings, on fire or not, have they demolished before or since 9/11?

    -Please link me to a C/D contractor’s web site, and show me the use of “pull” or “pull it” to refer to building demolition using explosives, not one in which cables are used to pull an already damaged building over, as was done with WTC 6.

    -How does a “terrible loss of life” in the WTC towers affect a later decision to demolish a nearby building with no one in it?

    -A number of FDNY personnel were inside WTC 7 prior to the pullback order, presumably at risk from the alleged explosives, and most of the 343 FDNY fatalities resulted from the tower collapses, so why are there only a few FDNY in the 9/11 “truth movement”? You can count the number in this “truth” organization right here: http://firefightersfor911truth.org/?page_id=469 Are they simply not as astute as you are, or don’t they care what killed so many of their colleagues?

    -There was a pre-existing ConEd substation at the Vesey Street WTC 7 site in 1986, and the building was designed to straddle it, requiring some of the extremely long ~45′ girder and ~52′ beam spans inside that contributed to the 9/11 collapse. It was powered up and in full use on 9/11/01, and the demolition of a 200,000 ton, 47-story building directly on top of it very likely destroyed it completely. Do you know whether ConEd’s insurers just absorbed the loss of tens of millions of dollars in infrastructure damage and restoration and then subrogated Industrial Risk Insurers, since Larry Silverstein’s firm was still the responsible party, especially if he deliberately caused the damage?

    You are not honoring the memory of Mr. McIlvaine’s highly successful and accomplished young son or any of the other victims of the 9/11 al Qaeda attacks on the WTC towers by demonstrating a complete lack of understanding of the events that occurred that day, and by falsely implicating people who were totally uninvolved in the planning or execution of the Planes Operation, as 9/11 was known to the al Qaeda terrorists behind it.

    Sincere best wishes,

    Albury

  7. Martin on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    Gordon, if you’re going to continue talking about the “murders” on 9/11, can you please address The Vicsim Report and the collapse of the CNN Victim’s Memorial? From where I sit it’s really starting to look like many, if not all, the victims themselves are fake. Are we going to believe that the demolitions are the only lie of the day? Here’s my take: Bob Mackle-vine is an actor, as are all the other “victims” family members. First, they tried hard to prevent people from figuring out the demolitions, but not anymore. They have even given up on trying to say planes crashed that day (Maybe NORAD didn’t stand down, maybe they never had a reason to stand up). The last thing they are trying to do is keep people thinking people really died. Could I be wrong? Maybe, but I doubt it. In all the footage I’ve seen, I’ve only seen one body of a “jumper” and it didn’t look right. No other bodies at all. Shouldn’t we see the evidence of planes and victims, and discuss it, and not continue assuming it exists? Regards.

  8. Earlaiman on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    Why does this “ghost of the truth” wander on and off stage like a ghost in a Shakespeare play?

    Because the audience does not believe in ghosts! That’s why!

    The “American” public is so accustomed to the fairy tales and pure bullshit they hav been swallowing as “news” of the day, “the facts, lady just the plain facts” for so long that they have become immune to it, and wold not only not recognize the Truth if it jumped up and bit them on the ass, they would go into shock and die from the trauma!

    Truth tends to make people think, a rare commodity in North America,it seems. It would be “simply more than they could handle.”

    Have mercy on the poor dipshits…. Truth has a way of emerging anyway, and when it does happen, it is going to be very difficult for them to handle.

    earlaiman

  9. Kelly on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    Albury, Many of your questions have been discussed and possible answers suggested in the literature. Some of your questions seem strenuously designed to be unanswerable at the present time since there has not been a proper forensic investigation – which is what A&E and NYCAN are requesting. You’d have to dance your way through a figurative zoo of 800 lb gorillas and elephants to find some of those obscure and not necessariy pertinent questions.

    Show me one non cd tall building collapse that falls like a controlled demolition – just one happening in a different time and place than 911 New York when 3 buildings performed this physics defying feat in a single day.

    Why should the building industry bother with controlled demos anyway?
    Just hit em with planes, any which way will do. That should be enough to cause them to collapse near perfectly into their own footprints.

    To make these contortionist arguments in order to prevent an independent investigation for these families… Strip it down and these are what your efforts become. What if you’re wrong?

  10. James B on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    I am cautious about Mr. Duff. Although he has a great deal of information his own bio leaves me wondering if he isn’t an agent provacatuer. He might seem like he’s on the cutting edge but my gut tells me if you put your faith in him your the one that will end up getting cut.

    Just a heads up to everyone out there looking for the truth and reality that seems so elusive.

    peace

  11. iamdestroyer on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    Tzvee’s Talmudic Blog – Is Geraldo Rivera jewish? Yes, attorney, journalist, writer, reporter and former talk show host Geraldo Rivera is a Jew. Rivera has worked with distinction for 40 years in TV journalism and entertainment. He currently hosts the program Geraldo at Large, and appears on Fox News Channel.

    Rivera was born July 4, 1943 at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York City (where this blogger was born some years later). He is the son of Lillian (née Lillie Friedman), a waitress and a cashier for the E. J. Korvettes store in Massapequa, N.Y., and the late Cruz “Allen” Rivera (October 1, 1915 – November 1987), who managed a kitchen at Republic Aviation, formerly in Farmingdale, N.Y. Rivera’s father was Puerto Rican of Spanish ancestry and his mother is of Ashkenazi Russian Jewish descent. According to Wikipedia, Rivera was raised “mostly Jewish” and had a Bar Mitzvah.

    We met Geraldo’s wife Erica today at the JCC on the Palisades where she serves on the board of directors (and swims laps in the pool). The couple resides in Edgewater, N.J., with their five year old child. http://tzvee.blogspot.com/2010/10/is-geraldo-rivera-jewish.html

  12. Debbie on the 16. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    Geraldo Rivera has always been more of a crude showman than a “news” presenter for a long , long time. He is a grandstander, who deals more in spectacle, than Truth on any given day. and wallows in his own mire of distorted taunts, lies, deceptions a la Wolf Blitzer, the small man with a big name at CNN.

    Jeff Gates author of Guilt by Association describes the likes of Geraldo Rivera and Wolf Blitzer, ‘the people in between’ accurately here…. http://australiansforpalestine.com/6054

    “ – In October 2007, Defense Secretary Robert Gates coined a generic term to describe the most challenging combatants when waging unconventional warfare. He called them simply “the people in between.” Those people, a dominant force in mainstream American media, comprise a fifth column in support of those skilled at waging war by way of deception.

    The term ‘fifth column’ originated in the Spanish Civil War of the 1930s to depict forces that clandestinely undermine a populace — from within — to aid an external enemy. The term was later cited as a rationale for interning citizens during WWII, including Germans in the UK and Japanese in the US Israelis routinely refer to Arab-Israelis as a fifth column residing within what Tel Aviv describes as the Jewish state.” Read More:

    http://australiansforpalestine.com/6054

  13. albury on the 17. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    Kelly: “Why should the building industry bother with controlled demos anyway?
    Just hit em with planes, any which way will do. That should be enough to cause them to collapse near perfectly into their own footprints.”

    The tower collapses destroyed WTCs 3, 4, 5, and 6 as well as several non-WTC buildings, and badly damaged several others, starting fires in WTC 7 that finally led to its collapse:

    http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofwtc7fires

    http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/accountsofwtc7damage

    http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofthewithdrawalfromwtc

    767s cost ~$150 million, the debris from them killed or injured a number of people on 9/11, and the fuel in them started fires that lasted for several months, poisoning the air around Ground Zero. That’s what you call controlled?
    The questions I asked above aren’t unanswerable, Kelly, you just refuse to answer them. There’s also been a proper forensic investigation of both tower collapses as well as the collapse of WTC 7, and I’d suggest that you read them before libeling your imaginary villains:

    http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201.pdf

    http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf

  14. StructuralEngineer on the 17. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    Isnt it “funny” that NIST has simply ignored most of those questions albury “has”?..lol, you all think he has an alternate agenda maybe?
    Peace, in-spite of the liars like these who would have it otherwise.

  15. albury on the 17. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    I doubt whether you’ve even read NCSTAR 1A, but what questions I asked that were in the scope of NIST’s investigation into the collapse of WTC 7 have been ignored by them? From what I’ve seen, it’s the 9/11 “truth movement” that’s ignoring them.

  16. Tom Tvedten on the 17. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    It is time, way past time, for all humane and honest Jews to renounce the Zionist criminal cabal that rules Israel and brought us 9/11 and join us in our fight against the psychopathic criminal minority that now cotrols “our” government, the MSM, and international bankking, and thus most of the corporate world. As “W” so aptly put it “You are either with us or you are with the terrorists.” THT

  17. David Howard on the 17. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    New York Senator Kirsten Gillibrand Supports New 9/11 Investigation –

    the nuclear destruction of the WTC and the China Syndrome Aftermath are the most important 9/11 issues.

    Google “Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC”

  18. Albury on the 18. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    re: http://buildingwhat.org/ask-officials-to-investigate-building-7/

    Since ~125 of the ~210 NIST scientists, engineers, and other experts involved in the WTC 7 collapse investigation which resulted in NCSTAR 1A were CIVILIANS from the private sector and academia, why are you urging us to “ask [government] OFFICIALS to investigate Building 7″?

  19. thirdeyewise on the 19. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    “You are not honoring the memory of Mr. McIlvaine’s highly successful and accomplished young son or any of the other victims of the 9/11 al Qaeda attacks on the WTC towers by demonstrating a complete lack of understanding of the events that occurred that day, and by falsely implicating people who were totally uninvolved in the planning or execution of the Planes Operation, as 9/11 was known to the al Qaeda terrorists behind it.”

    Honoring a father’s wish regarding his dead son is honoring the son. It is a fact that the 911 commission report barely mentions bldg7. That is in itself very odd.

  20. Albury on the 22. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    Why is that “odd,” thirdeyewise? The 9/11 Commission Report didn’t mention WTCs 3, 4, 5, 6, or any of the non-WTC buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the 9/11/01 al Qaeda attacks either. The towers were only mentioned because they were once again targeted by the same terrorists who detonated a truck bomb in a North Tower parking level in 1993.
    If you think WTC 7 was “barely mentioned,” you haven’t even read the report, which doesn’t mention it at all, but if you take a minute to look at the index, you’ll see that there’s no heading where it would go. It simply wasn’t the purpose of the report to list all of the property damage sustained on 9/11, but it’s the entire topic of NCSTAR 1A, which you probably haven’t read either.
    Here are both links if you’d like to read something besides “truth movement” malarkey:
    http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm
    http://wtc.nist.gov/NCSTAR1/PDF/NCSTAR%201A.pdf

    (NIST site is temporarily down for maintenance.)

  21. David Howard on the 24. Nov, 2010 remarked #

    The Utter Disinfo in the Nuclear 9/11 Field …

    http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1262927/pg1

Leave a Comment