House of Representatives resolution 1553, introduced by Congressional Republicans, and currently working its way through the system will endorse an Israeli attack on Iran, which would be going to war by proxy as the US would almost immediately be drawn into the conflict when Tehran retaliates. The resolution provides explicit US backing for Israel to bomb Iran, stating that Congress supports Israel’s use of “all means necessary…including the use of military force”. The resolution is non-binding, but it is dazzling in its disregard for the possible negative consequences that would ensue for the hundreds of thousands of US military and diplomatic personnel currently serving in the Near East region. Even the Pentagon opposes any Israeli action against Iran, knowing that it would mean instant retaliation against US forces in Iraq and also in Afghanistan. The resolution has appeared, not coincidentally, at the same time as major articles by leading neoconservatives Reuel Marc Gerecht and Bill Kristol calling for military action. AIPAC thinks it is wonderful.
Ironically, the push against Iran comes at a time when the National Intelligence Estimate on the country is being finished. It might come out as soon as August, but it will be secret and its conclusions will either be leaked or released in summary. My sources inside the intelligence community insist that it will support the 2007 NIE that concluded that Iran no longer has a weapons program. The White House has delayed the process seeking harder language to justify a range of options against Iran, including a military strike, but the analysts are reported to be resisting. So we spend $100 billion on intelligence annually and then ignore the best judgments on what is taking place. Might as well use a Ouija board.
Source: American Conservative (http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2010/07/27/who-voted-for-war-with-iran-mr-obama/)
Philip Giraldi is a former military intelligence and CIA counter-terrorism official. He is a partner in Cannistraro Associates, the co-publisher of Intelligence Brief and writes Deep Backround for the American Conservative. His analysis are regularly featured in Antiwar.com
Thierry Meyssan in his latest article, titled “Who’s affraid of Iran’s civilian nuclear program?” has raised some other valid points other than Jewish Lobby’s cry of “Ahmadinejad calls for a new Holocaust of the Jews”. He believes that Ahmadinejad, in the footsteps of Brazilian President Lula, wants to create a ‘nuclear free zone’ in the Middle East which if pursued by the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, which are also nuclear powers – would take the bite of the Zionist entity and its day of bulling its neighbors would be gone. That would also make the Jewish army an easy target for the Hizbullah fighters to play around, they did in the Summer 2006 war…..
http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/wests-fear-of-irans-nuclear-program/
Would vote likewise